Go congratulate James on his letter in the Daily News responding to Jonathan Capehart’s ridiculous column on SONDA and transgender protection.
—
When they edited his letter, they messed up his grammar. He understands subject/verb agreement, in case you were wondering.
I did one of my only “holiday” things today. James and I went to the New York Public Library’s annual holiday open house: free wine and food, musicians, stilt walkers, dancers, and magicians were scattered around the main building at 42nd and Fifth.
Of course the musical highlight was the West Point Glee Club:
Mr. 3rd-from-the-left was wearing a Santa hat with little flashing lights — and had the most stripes, whatever that means. He was a star, and he knew it.
The NYPL is a great organization, and a $40 donation gets you an invitation for two ($100 gets four people in). It’s worth it!
There is a cool exhibit at the moment on the history of New York restaurants and food. It’s up through March 1, 2003 — and it’s free.
New US Visa Rules Force Foreign Artists to Stay Away
I didn’t know this:
Less widely know is that all would-be foreign male visitors to the US aged between 16 and 45 — but not women — must now account for every country visited in the last decade, in case they are terrorists.
There is a news story that Sen. Don Nickles of Oklahoma (no. 2 in the Senate) wants a new vote on the GOP Majority Leader. Look at this quote:
“I am concerned that Senator Lott has been weakened to the point that may jeopardize his ability to enact our agenda and speak to all Americans,” Nickles said in a statement. “There are several outstanding senators who are more than capable of effective leadership, and I hope we have an opportunity to choose.”
In an ABC interview, he added: “Can he be effective? Can he campaign in places like Chicago? I don’t want to squander our ability to get things done. We only have a short window this year.”
What’s with the Chicago bit? I guess he thinks the GOP has the blacks in Oklahoma and Mississippi under control, but they’re not as docile in some of those Yankee cities?
—
Remember people, Nickles isn’t exactly a nice alternative. He was one of the main opponents of Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg:
He said that President’s Clinton’s appointment of philanthropist James Hormel, who is openly gay, to an ambassador’s post in Luxembourg should be denied because Hormel promotes “immoral behavior.”
The Bible, according to the Oklahoma Senator’s calculations, teaches that homosexual behavior is “a sin” and “if one promotes that behavior…that person shouldn’t be a representative of this country.”
Here is some information on his voting record.
I haven’t seen it yet, but I plan to do so soon. Pete Hamill has column today in the Daily News that everyone should read before seeing the movie, reminding us that the history in the movie is bunk — go see it, but don’t think it’s real.
Like Dan’l, I’m a big fan of Luc Sante’s Low Life as a good history of the seedier sides of NYC. It’s another thing worth reading around the time you see the movie.
Cool:
Keeping Track of John Poindexter
The head of the government’s Total Information Awareness project, which aims to root out potential terrorists by aggregating credit-card, travel, medical, school and other records of everyone in the United States, has himself become a target of personal data profiling.
Online pranksters, taking their lead from a San Francisco journalist, are publishing John Poindexter’s home phone number, photos of his house and other personal information to protest the TIA program.
In honor of my friend Jonathan, I present The Wau Wau Sisters’ cover of “C’mon Feel the Noise!”
MP3 (3MB)
Now he owes me the pictures of him in an S&M/Leather production of a Jean Genet play in grad school.
Hilary Clinton sees that the shifting sentiments of the public regarding l’Affaire Lott require her to modify her initial tepid comments a bit. I sent her an email saying I thought Lott should be censured by the Senate, at a minimum. I think he should be forced out, except that a damaged GOP is probably the safest thing for all of us.
Click MORE to see the December 11 and December 13 versions of her e-mail. I didn’t send a new e-mail in the intervening period. It appears two days later that she is shocked, simply shocked, to find racist behavior coming from Mr. Lott. I guess she hasn’t paid attention for the last 20 years.
December 11, 2002
Dear Mr. _________:
Thank you for sharing your concerns with me regarding statements made by
Senator Trent Lott. Following is a statement that I issued yesterday in
regard to the Senator’s remarks. It is very important to me to hear from
my constituents in regard to issues that are important to them.
“How can anyone doubt that America is better off having elected Harry
Truman in 1948. As many of my colleagues have said, these comments were
wrong and certainly warranted an apology. Our leaders should be bringing
people together not opening old wounds with statements that celebrate one
of the most troubling and heart breaking times in our nation’s history.”
If you would like to respond to my e-mail or contact me via e-mail about
this or any other subject, please use my web response form at
http://clinton.senate.gov/email_form.html. Because of the size of my
constituency and the growing number who choose to communicate through
e-mail, I have selected the web form as the fairest and most equitable
system to respond to e-mail messages. E-mails that are sent as a direct
response to my outgoing e-mail fall outside the system and do not receive
a response.
Please check my website at http://clinton.senate.gov for regular updates
on this and other important issues being discussed before the United
States Senate.
Sincerely yours,
Hillary Rodham Clinton
December 13, 2002
Dear Mr. _______:
I agree that what Senator Trent Lott said at Senator Strom Thurmond’s
100th birthday party is an extremely serious issue that must be addressed,
and I appreciate your taking the time to contact my office about it.
The ideas that were embraced in Strom Thurmond’s 1948 campaign were
strongly rejected by the American people because those ideas were wrong.
More than a generation ago, Americans of different races and creeds put
their lives on the line so that equality, justice, and economic
opportunity would be available to every American. We are far better off
today as a nation because of their struggle. Leaders in Senator Lott’s
position should be bringing the American people together by celebrating
our nation’s progress, not tearing us apart by suggesting that
segregationist policies of the past were or are somehow acceptable.
The public outrage over Senator Lott’s comments is justified. His
comments were offensive and divisive. In the face of great challenges at
home and abroad, Americans need to join together in celebration of and
support for the values that distinguish us as a great nation. One of these
values is the belief in the equality of all people, and the very idea of
segregation strikes at the heart of that equality. It is my hope that
every American leader, regardless of political affiliation, will strongly
condemn these comments, and make clear that there is no place in our
society, either in public discourse or private dialogue, for such
statements that seem to condone racist policies of the past.
Our nation long ago rejected segregation and it is shocking that the man
who holds the most powerful position in the Senate has suggested in 1980,
1984, and again last week, that it is an acceptable practice. This raises
fundamental questions about his fitness to be Majority Leader. I would
not vote for someone to lead my caucus who made those offensive remarks
but the Republicans will need to decide if this is how they wish to be
represented.
You can be sure that I will continue to work with my colleagues to fight
ideas and policies that are divisive or seek to take America back to a
time when equality of opportunity was not a guarantee. Thank you again
for sharing your views, and please keep in touch.
If you would like to respond to my e-mail or contact me via e-mail about
this or any other subject, please use my web response form at
http://clinton.senate.gov/email_form.html. Because of the size of my
constituency and the growing number who choose to communicate through
e-mail, I have selected the web form as the fairest and most equitable
system to respond to e-mail messages. E-mails that are sent as a direct
response to my outgoing e-mail fall outside the system and do not receive
a response.
Via FAIR